Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Kearney v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1986No. 84-727Published

1ConcurrenceKrivosha, C.J.

I concur in the result reached by the plurality in this case. I do not agree, however, with the method by which the plurality reaches its result, and for that reason I write separately.

The plurality has concluded that a dismissal with prejudice, absent a court order, is not a bar to the bringing of another suit, although the subsequent action may be subject to the defense of estoppel or some related legal doctrine not now before us.

In my view the action of the city attorney in dismissing case No. 7203 was void. Obviously, if the action was void, we need not engage in any discussion regarding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelley v. MilanSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Warren v. County of StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Heese v. WenkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. City of St. Paul v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API