Legal Opinion

Blum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 30, 1950No. 10038, 10039PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

These. appeals are from the decision of the Tax Court.

The question presented is whether periodical payments to the petitioner (“taxpayer”) of a percentage of a manufacturing corporation’s net sales of certain products were compensation taxable as ordinary income or whether they were consideration paid for the sale of several patents constituting capital assets and as such taxable as long-term capital gains.

The answer depends on whether the taxpayer “sold” the patents to the maker of the payments, Henry Disston & Sons, Inc., (“Company”) or whether the patents already…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Houghton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Luna v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  2. Beck Chemical Equipment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Chilton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API