Legal Opinion · Dissent

G.A. Lotz Co. v. Alack

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 2014No. 13-CA-674Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

hi, respectfully, dissent, in part, from the majority opinion on whether Defendants, David DeMonte and Paul Varisco, could be held personally liable for the alleged breach of contract by GALCO.

Appellants allege the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants and dismissing their third-party demand by finding Defendants were not guarantors of the sale contract. Appellants aver there is serious disagreement concerning the nature and significance of Defendants signatures on the sale contract as intervenors. Appellants contend that Defendants executed the sale contract…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Campbell v. MeltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  4. Kappa Loyal v. Plaisance Dragline & Dredg.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Bourgeois, Bennett v. Gauthier, DowningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API