Legal Opinion

Michel Cosmetics, Inc. v. Tsirkas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1941Published

1Opinion of the Court

Action for an injunction, an accounting, and to recover damages for unfair competition. Appeal from an order referring the issues to an official referee to hear and report dismissed, without costs. Such order is not appealable. (Matter of Silaski, 175 App. Div. 199; Luttenberger v. Alpert Woodworking Corp., 252 id. 862; Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Madgo Realty Corp., 256 id. 954.) It would seem, however, that the hearing should be conducted toward the end directed by the opinion in this ease in 282 N. Y. 195, and not in accordance with the wording of the order, which refers to the provision in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Michel Cosmetics, Inc. v. TsirkasNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. In re SilaskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API