Whittemore v. Baxter Laundry Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent; Brown, J. Bill by Arthur W. Whittemore, et al., against the Baxter Laundry Company for the abatement of a nuisance. From a decree for complainants, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The defendant is the owner of a laundry and dry-cleaning establishment in the city of Grand Rapids, occupying the easterly portion of a block bounded on the north by Hawthorne street, on the east by Eastern avenue, on the south by Fountain street, and on the west by Grand avenue. The complainants are the owners of property, and reside, in the westerly *565portion of the block. With the exception of defendant’s plant, the location is strictly a residence district, and the complainant Arthur W. Whittemore owns and occupies a house and lot immediately adjoining defendant’s premises on the west, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heeg v. . LichtNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Wier's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Sharon Proos Kosters v. The Seven-Up Company, & Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Buchholz v. Standard Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.