Legal Opinion
Blais v. Deyo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
In granting the motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law or in exercising that discretion fail to take into account all of the various factors entitled to consideration (Irrigation & Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag, S.A., 37 NY2d 522, 525).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Irrigation & Industrial Development Corp. v. Indag S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thomas v. HanmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Bank Hapoalim (Switzerland) Ltd. v. Banca Intesa S.P.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Reisch v. McGuiganDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Economos v. ZizikasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Nevader v. DeyoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.