Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Carlin & Fulton

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Orange county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney

This is an action of replevin tried by the court without a jury, by consent of parties.

There is no bill of exceptions, and, consequently, questions upon the evidence cannot be considered.

Damages are laid in the declaration at $700. The plaintiffs, Carlin & Fulton, having elected, as permitted by our replevin statute, to take a recovery for the value of the goods, the court found the same to be $742.68, and judgment was rendered for this amount and costs. It is urged that the judgment is, on account of the excess over the ad damnum of the declaration, erroneous. It seemed to us at the time of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McLean v. SprattSupreme Court of Florida · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Younglove v. KnoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API