Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania R. R. v. Elliott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Epitomized Opinion

First Publication of this Opinion

Elliott sued R. R. in Mahoning Common Pleas, alleg'-’ng that in crossing R. R. tracks she caught her foot in worn out planking, fell forward, and was severely injured. Evidence disclosed that just as she was clearing the tracks, a train came by. Whether she was hit by the train was disputed. The court refused to charge that it was Elliott’s duty to exercise reasonable care to discover, an approaching train, and if she went upon the tracks in such close proximity to the approaching train that the engineer could not, in the exercise of ordinary…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dayton v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API