State v. Clark
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEITT, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for a bill of particulars, contending that the court violated G.S. 15-143 and his right to due process of law. This assignment has no merit. The statute clearly provides that a motion for a bill of particulars is addressed to the discretion of the trial judge and our courts have held consistently that the trial judge’s ruling on the motion is not subject to review except for palpable and gross abuse of discretion. State v. Overman, 269 N.C. 453, 153 S.E. 2d 44 (1967) ; State v. Robinson, 15 N.C. App. 362, 190 S.E. 2d 270 (1972);…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Lee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- State v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. LachatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986