Legal Opinion

Ricords v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from, Si. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

This is the same case that was in this court under the name of Smith vs. Ricords’ Adm’x, (52 Mo., 581) and we are now asked to re-consider and reverse the decision then *554rendered. The only question is, whether the.statute of limitations applies. The facts are stated in the former opinion, and if we admit that the evidence adduced showed an implied trust as against Eicords, it is still difficult to perceive upon what ground this bar of the statute could be prevented from running. The question as to when trustees who have acted in a fiduciary capacity may avail themselves of the statute of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kane v. BloodgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
  2. Keeton's Heirs v. Keeton's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  3. Smith v. RicordsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bent v. PriestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Atlantic National Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Lipscomb v. TalbottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Bramell v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Kerber v. RoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API