Legal Opinion
Hinds Cnty. v. Skinner (In Re Appointment & Setting Salary for Cnty. Court Adm'r & Deputy Court Adm'r)
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 2019No. 2017-CA-01269-SCTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIS, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:
¶1. Hinds County appeals from an administrative order signed by two Hinds County Court judges that appointed and set the salaries of the county court administrator and the deputy county court administrator. The county judges sought to set the salaries of their administrators at an amount greater than the budgeted amount set by the Hinds County Board of Supervisors. In this direct appeal, Hinds County asks that the order be vacated. We find that this appeal is not properly before the Court. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the matter is remanded to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- State v. MaplesMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
- Crittenden v. Town of BoonevilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
- John A. Brown v. Collections, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- McClain v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cook v. Hinds County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023