Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Nathan Vehon Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1930No. 20195. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heard

This cause is here on certiorari to the Appellate Court for the First District. In the municipal court of Chicago defendant in error, Philip S. Bloom, (called plaintiff,) recovered a judgment for $25,701.19 against plaintiff in error, the Nathan Vehon Company, (called defendant). This judgment was affirmed by the Appellate Court.

Plaintiff filed a second amended statement of claim, in which he alleged substantially that he was employed by defendant prior to January 1, 1926; that defendant agreed to pay him a salary for the year 1926 in the sum of $10,000; that he received on account thereof…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. DeYoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Coal Creek Drainage & Levee District v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Voorhees v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McKinnie v. LaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Quigley v. W. N. MacQueen & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Winger v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Green v. Ashland Sixty-Third State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Wing v. LedererAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Tucson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Aetna Investment Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hemingway v. Skinner Engineering Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API