Legal Opinion

Davis v. Bureau of Crimes Compensation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 1981No. ZZ-377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Davis, the appellant, filed a claim under Chapter 960, Florida Statutes (1979), seeking compensation for injuries he received in his capacity as a pedestrian when struck by an automobile driven by a “hit and run” motorist. The deputy commissioner denied the appellant’s claim, finding that the “hit and run” incident alone without proof of intent to inflict injury is insufficient to constitute a “crime” for the purposes of Chapter 960.03(3); Florida Statutes (1979). We approve the deputy’s interpretation of the statute and accordingly affirm his order.

Davis concedes that there was no evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Greyhound Lines-East Division v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Medlin v. Bureau of Crimes Compensation Division of Workers' Compensation, Department of Labor & SecurityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API