Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Augustin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1848Published

APPEAL by the plaintiff from ajudgment of the Fifth District Court of New In this case, on the first hearing, the judgment of ■the lower court was affirmed, for the reasons assigned by the judge a quo. The case involved no question of law,

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court on the re-hearing was pronounced by

Kino. J.

The plaintiff instituted this action to set aside an adjudication made by the sheriff of certain property, which she alleges belongs to her, and was illegally seized to satisfy a judgment rendered against Mrs. Bernard Hart. She also claimed damages for the alleged wrongful acts of the sheriff, and obtained an injunction restraining Romer, the purchaser, and the sheriff, from dispossessing her. Various defences were pleaded by the defendants, and Romer prayed for the dissolution of the injunction, with damages. The district…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benkard v. BabcockThe Superior Court of New York City · 1864
  2. Hyde v. BrashearSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API