Legal Opinion

Freligh v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The notice of intention to sue complied substantially with section 394a-1.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York “with such practical certainty as to satisfy the purpose of the statute” (Denecke v. Property Collaterals, Inc., 279 N. Y. 105, 107) so as “ to give the city the opportunity to investigate' such claim.” (Schwartz v. City of New York, 250 N. Y. 332, 335.) The accident happened at the southwest corner of Vanderbilt and St. Marks avenues, in Brooklyn. The reference to premises on St. Marks avenue was as unnecessary as it was erroneous. But, in view of the small area…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walden v. . City of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Schwartz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Denecke v. Property Collaterals, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Luca v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API