City & County of Denver v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
This cause has been heard, and. considered, by the Court, Mr. Justice McWilliams not participating. Mr. Chief Justice Hall, Mr. Justice Sutton and Mr. Justice Frantz are in favor of affirmance of the judgment of the trial court. Mr. Justice Moore, Mr. Justice Day and Mr. Justice Doyle are in favor of reversal. The judgment therefore stands affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided Court. (Rule 118 (f), R.C.P.)
STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE McWILLIAMS.
I am not participating in this matter for several reasons. I did not become a member of this Court until January 10, 1961, and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Coors v. Security Life of Denver Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- City and County of Denver v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Ferguson v. Rockwell International Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- City and County of Denver v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Coors v. Security Life of Denver Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.