Legal Opinion
Rimal v. Wibisono
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 16, 2009No. 19-12100PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
THOMAS J. CATLIOTA, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court are the Amended Complaint for Non-Dischargeability of Debt Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2) (Docket No. 9) filed by Plaintiff Shaman Rimal (“Rimal”), and the Answer to Amended Complaint (Docket No. 11) filed by Defendants Gunawan Kuntho Wibisono (“Wibisono”) and Melania Dessy Pasetyani (“Pasetyani”). The Court conducted a trial of this adversary proceeding on February 18, 2009. For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum of Decision, the Court will enter an order ruling that Wibisono’s undisputed debt to Rimal, in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- In Re Bashir Y. Anastas, Debtor. Bashir Y. Anastas v. American Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hernandez v. Sulier (In re Sulier)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Kovens v. Goodwich (In re Goodwich)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2014