Legal Opinion

Whipple v. Lee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1910No. 8382PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Yakey, J., entered March 23, 1909, decreeing the specific performance of a contract, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action commenced by W. W. Whipple, against D. H. Lee, the American Investment & Improvement Company, a corporation, and others, to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. An opinion on a former appeal, affirming an order appointing a receiver, is reported in Whipple v. Lee, 42 Wash. 266, 89 Pac. 712. The plaintiff now seeks specific performance of the contract, as successor in interest to J. R. Young. A decree of specific performance was entered. The plaintiff, however, has appealed, contending that the decree requires him to pay an excessive consideration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gammel v. GoodeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Lane v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Mulligan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Whipple v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Obern v. GilbertSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API