Wilson v. Beauchamp
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Yalobusha County. Hon, William Kellogg, Judge, presiding. The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Yalobusha County. Hon, William Kellogg, Judge, presiding. The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. The following are the assignments of error : 1. The said original and amended bills disclose no case entitling the complainants to relief. 2. The facts as established by the exhibits and evidence are not sufficient to entitle the complainants to recover. 8. The evidence as a whole does not sustain the allegation of the original and amended bills. 4. And for or.her reasons the appellees say that the said decree ought to be…
1Opinion of the CourtPeyton, J.
Mary Beauchamp and W. T. Beauchamp, her husband, Ellen Heath and Henry Heath, her husband, Mary E. Wilson, Henry E. Wilson, and James A. Wilson, filed their bill in the chancery *28court of Yalobusha county against Nancy Wilson, Robert Wilson, Thomas H. Wilson, Annie Davidson, Rebecca Doak and J. S. Doak, her husband, alleging that in the year 1844, Archibald Wilson, since deceased, purchased from one John Reed a certain tract of land situated near the town of Grenada in said county, containing about 480 acres, as decribed and set out in the bill. The bill further states that the said Archibald…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Morrison v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Mills v. Damson Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Hillman v. ClaytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
- Vicksburg Bank v. MossMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
- Harrison v. Eagle Lumber & Supply Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.