Tolnai v. Craven
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Bergan, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny in the following memorandum: Plaintiff is not entitled to an examination before trial of Gertrude S. Freitag, as executrix, as a party because all items upon which the examination is sought involve transactions which occurred prior to her appointment as executrix (Pardee v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co., 238 App. Div. 294, 297). In my view it would be improper to examine the executrix in her representative…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pardee v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clark T. Chambers, Inc. v. AbberleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- In re the Accounting of RosenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
- In re the Estate of MoodyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962