Legal Opinion

Timothy Bumb v. Steven Gobin

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 21, 2025No. 5:25-cv-04729Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TIMOTHY BUMB, Case No. 25-cv-04729-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 10 STEVEN GOBIN, Re: Dkt. No. 9 11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is Defendant Steven Gobin’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Timothy 13 Bumb’s Complaint for failure to state a claim. Dkt. 9 (the “Motion”). The Court finds the Motion 14 suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having reviewed the Parties’ 15 submissions,1 the relevant law and the record in this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. W. Eugene Scott v. Edward L. Kuhlmann, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API