Legal Opinion

Davis v. Dixon

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia

Decided July 27, 1910No. 421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by George N. Davis against Samuel Dixon, the Stuart Collieries Company, and others. On plea in abatement chai--lenging the jurisdiction of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

KELLER, District Judge.

This matter is before me upon a plea to the jurisdiction based on the allegation that the plaintiff is not really a citizen and resident of the state of Virginia, but is in fact a citizen of West Virginia, and that the suit should be dismissed by virtue of section 5 of the act of March 3, 1875, c. 137, 18 Stat. 472, as amended by Act Aug. 13, 1888, c. 866, § 6, 25 Stat. 436 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 511). The burden of proof, as well as of allegation, is upon the defendant to make out this defense to the jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. Street’s Fed. Eq.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ennis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. Butler v. FarnsworthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1821

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McHaney v. CunninghamDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1925
  2. Barbero v. BarberoVirginia Circuit Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API