Modoc Lassen Indian Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBacharach, J.
I join the majority’s .excellent opinion in Parts 11(A) and (C). But in connection with Part 11(B), I respectfully dissent. In my view, HUD enjoyed statutory authority to recoup overpayments under the block grants. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion in Part 11(B) that HUD lacked this authority.
The Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (“NAHASDA”) authorizes a pool of funds for HUD to allocate among Native American tribes. In this case, HUD overpaid certain tribes and - sought to recoup the overpayments through administrative…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.