Legal Opinion

McNelly v. Marshall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1913Published

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eichland county: Geoege CleMeetsoN, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.

The findings of the circuit court are to the effect that Harvey and Samantha Marshall, he a widower with children, and she a widow with children, were married about thirty-five years ago, resided together up to the time *334of her death upon a farm in Richland county belonging to Harvey, and accumulated considerable property and money. There was no issue of this marriage. She died intestate June 1, 1911, he died intestate January 12, 1912, and after her death there was found in-her possession seven certificates of deposit on certain local banks, six of which were payable to Samantha and one to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crosetti's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Qualters' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Cummings v. FriedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Mains v. Webber's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API