Kurtz v. Sanford Fire Apparatus Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law with costs and cross motion denied, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred by dismissing the City of Syracuse’s cross claim for reimbursement of medical expenses and salary benefits paid to firefighter Michael Kurtz pursuant to section 207-a of the General Municipal Law. Although a claim for reimbursement under subdivision (7) of that section is derivative and permissible only if the disabled firefighter possessed a cause of action which could have been asserted against third parties (see, City of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. MaggioNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- City of Buffalo v. MaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- City of Buffalo v. MurryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Fuller v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Calabria v. St. Regis Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CaballeroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- City of Syracuse v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- M/S SHIRAZ IMPEX v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989