Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Sanford Fire Apparatus Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law with costs and cross motion denied, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred by dismissing the City of Syracuse’s cross claim for reimbursement of medical expenses and salary benefits paid to firefighter Michael Kurtz pursuant to section 207-a of the General Municipal Law. Although a claim for reimbursement under subdivision (7) of that section is derivative and permissible only if the disabled firefighter possessed a cause of action which could have been asserted against third parties (see, City of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. MaggioNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. City of Buffalo v. MaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. City of Buffalo v. MurryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Fuller v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Calabria v. St. Regis Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CaballeroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. City of Syracuse v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. M/S SHIRAZ IMPEX v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API