TRIANGLE PRINTING COMPANY v. Image Quest
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentOlszewski, J.
¶ 1 While the majority view provides a cogent analysis and rationale, I am obliged to differ and therefore, respectfully dissent.
*1001¶ 2 The majority establishes today that a District Justice need only certify a transcript to the Common Pleas Prothonotary showing that a judgment was entered against a defendant at some particular time and that the defendant failed to appeal the judgment within thirty days. Majority opinion, at 1000. The majority view also establishes that it is not necessary for a District Justice to show that any of the procedures our Supreme Court has drafted for his guidance…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Sharp v. Valley Forge Medical Center & Heart Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Roberts v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Knox v. NoggleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.