Teney v. Laing
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Chautauqua District Court. Proceeding by Mary Laing, as administratrix, against J. G. Teney and H. W. Laing. Judgment for the plaintiff, on March 6, 1889. The defendants bring the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
*298Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
The material facts are, that for years prior to September, 1886, H. W. Laing resided on a farm in Chautauqua county, his family consisting of a daughter, intermarried with J. G. Teney, and a son named Thomas E. Laing. In April, 1886, four months before his death, the son married the defendant in error, and brought her to his father’s house, where they lived together until the death of Thomas E. Laing. During all this time, and long before the marriage of Thomas E. Laing, there was a firm doing business — buying, selling and shipping cattle and hogs — under the firm-name…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bredow v. Mutual Savings InstitutionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Blaker v. SandsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Carr v. CatlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Weise v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newhouse v. HeilbrunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Campbell v. BohanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Thomas v. MannWyoming Supreme Court · 1913
- Clark v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932