Legal Opinion

Shoecraft v. Catholic Social Services Bureau, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1986No. 85-657PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court for Lancaster County holding that Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-104.02 et seq. (Reissue 1984) are void as violative of the U.S. and Nebraska constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection. Section 43-104.02 provides in part:(1) Relinquishment or consent for the purpose of adoption given only by a mother of a child born out of wedlock pursuant to section 43-104 shall be sufficient to place the child for adoption and the rights of any alleged father shall not be recognized thereafter in any court unless the person claiming to be the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Grape v. ZachNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ruben Pena v. Edward Mattox, Charles Bretz, Patricia Schneider, and Others UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Guardianship of DJNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. UHING ON BEHALF OF JONES v. UhingNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API