Legal Opinion

United States v. Mauro Delmendo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1974No. 73-2707PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Delmendo appeals from a judgment denaturalizing him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1451(d). The issue is whether the evidence supported the district court’s determination that Delmendo lacked intention to reside permanently in the United States when he filed his petition for naturalization. We conclude that the evidence was insufficient and that the district court’s contrary conclusion was based on a misapplication of 8 U.S.C. § 1451(d).

Under section 1451(d), proof that a naturalized citizen established a permanent residence abroad within five years from his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Schneider v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Perrone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  5. Bechtel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Parviz BanafsheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API