Legal Opinion
Continental Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 30, 1985No. Court 84-05-00728PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
WATSON, Judge:
These consolidated actions were brought to challenge the conclusion of the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce (Commerce) that, as a matter of law,, subsidies cannot be found in countries which have nonmarket economies.
In two countervailing duty investigations the challenged conclusion led Commerce to reach final determinations that manufacturers, producers, or exporters of carbon steel wire rod in Czechoslovakia and Poland were not receiving subsidies. 1 The same reasoning led Commerce to rescind the investigations into whether…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Georgetown Steel Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- GPX International Tire Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- NEC Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- United States v. GordonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987