Legal Opinion
Indig v. Indig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1051The determination of visitation issues is entrusted to the sound discretion of the Family Court, and must be based upon the best interests of the child (see Matter of Wiebke v Wiebke, 77 AD3d 964, 964 [2010]; Matter of Ciccone v Ciccone, 74 AD3d 1337, 1338 [2010]; Matter of Thompson v Yu-Thompson, 41 AD3d 487, 488 [2007]). The Family Court’s determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Larkin v White, 79 AD3d 751, 751 [2010]; Matter of Wiebke v Wiebke, 77 AD3d at 964; Matter of Ciccone v Ciccone, 74 AD3d at 1338).
The Family…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. Yu-ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bentley v. BentleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Powell v. BlumenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Booth v. BoothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ciccone v. CicconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DeSimone v. DelanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Walker v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012