Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Romero

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2007No. 315 CAPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

938 A.2d 362 (2007)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee

v.

Edwin Rios ROMERO, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted August 1, 2001.

Decided December 28, 2007.

Alexandra B. Fensterer, Norman, OK, Christina Allison Swarns, New York, NY, for Edwin Rios Romero.

Theodore Rafael Racines, Allentown, Robert A. Graci, Harrisburg, for Com., appellee.

BEFORE CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, BALDWIN, FITZGERALD, JJ.

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

Appellant appeals from the order denying him relief pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. งง 9541-9546. We affirm.

Appellant was…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API