United States v. Thomas
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM: *
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Stuttgart, Federal Republic of Germany. Pursuant to his pleas, he was convicted of conspiracy to commit larceny and making a false claim in violation of Articles 81 and 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881 and 932 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ], Appellant’s sentence, approved by the convening authority, included a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. Before us, appellant contends that the Department of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Neifert-White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. StaatsSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- United States v. WarnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- Bridgeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991