Legal Opinion
Maddaloni Jewelers, Inc. v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 25, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*630Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered August 20, 2009, which denied defendant’s motion for preclusion of plaintiffs substituted damages expert or, in the alternative, for the attorneys’ fees and costs attributable to the substitution of the expert, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court exercised its discretion in a provident manner in denying defendant’s motion for preclusion. Although defendant may have incurred expenses in preparing a rebuttal to plaintiffs initial expert’s report, there was no indication that plaintiff s substitution of its expert…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whitney v. Quaker Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lissak v. CerabonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mateo v. 83 Post Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gallo v. LinkowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- St. Hilaire v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Castor Petroleum, Ltd. v. Petroterminal de Panama, S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ramsen A. v. New York City Housing AuthourityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ramsen A. v. New York City Housing AuthourityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013