In re Miller
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The respondent in this case, Verdelski V. Miller, has been charged by the Disciplinary Commission of this Court with violating certain disciplinary rules contained in the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. In accordance with Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23(ll)(e), the parties have tendered for this Court’s approval a conditional agreement for discipline. The parties agree and request that the respondent receive a six month suspension from the practice of law with automatic reinstatement, conditioned on the satisfaction of certain unpaid liens and…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of ConwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of RaglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of GrotrianIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
4Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of KnobelIndiana Supreme Court · 1998