R. Brauss & Co. v. United States
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
1Opinion of the Court
WHEELER, District Judge.
These are bundles of split bamboo, about 12 inches long, intended for use in making brooms, and have been assessed for duty as “manufactures of wood,” under paragraph 208 of the act of July 24, 1897, c. 11 (30 Stat. 168 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1647]), as against bamboo, in the phrase “bamboo, rattan, reeds unmanufactured,” in paragraph 700 (30 Stat. 202 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1689]), as part of the free list. If “unmanufactured” does not reach back and include bamboo, these bundles are clearly in the free list, for they contain nothing but bamboo. If it does, it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Frazee v. MoffittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. LarzelereCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. SteebCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Protests 987082-G (A) of Hub Floral Mfg. Co.United States Customs Court · 1942