Legal Opinion

Hill v. Muchow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff $4,450,947.02 on his personal injury cause of action, defendants contend that the jury’s award of $2.5 million for plaintiff’s future pain and suffering is excessive; that the court erred in failing to reduce the verdict by the amount of any collateral source payments pursuant to CPLR *9554545; that the court erred in failing to "structure” the future damages…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eschberger v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Venable v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Taylor v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doe v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Bunt v. Altec Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
  3. Damiano v. Exide Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. Reed v. Harter Chair Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Bongiovanni v. Staten Island Medical Group, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API