Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. Milman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.

Judgment modified by reversing as to Policy No. 3,696,772, and as so modified, the judgment is affirmed with costs to the appellant.

On the application for reinstatement of the above numbered policy, defendant failed to disclose that he had consulted physicians once for constipation and three or four times for a cold. Such failure did not constitute “ a misrepresentation, material or otherwise.” (Geer v. Union Mut. Life Ins. Co., 273 N. Y. 261, 267.) The printed application form stated: “ I hereby certify that I am in good health; that except as stated below, I have had no illness, have not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Geer v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Jenkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. MilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API