Legal Opinion
Lyders v. Petersen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1937No. 8354PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
Reversal is sought of an order of the trial court denying a petition to review an order of the referee in bankruptcy allowing claims of one Petersen and others for $20,000 with interest as a general claim. The basis of the claim is a judgment in five cases consolidated in the state court of California in which appellant had made defense, as is here offered as objections, to allowance of the claim. Concisely stated, it is claimed that in each of the cases he was employed by one of the seventeen “Danish Nationals” of the “Debtor” as their attorney at law to represent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. SwopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Arbulich v. ArbulichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Arbulich v. ArbulichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946