Legal Opinion · Dissent

Combs v. Adams

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1977No. 49960Published

1DissentPatterson, Chief Justice

I dissent with some misgivings. This is because of the general reliance of the bench and bar upon Mississippi Code Annotated section 1-3-67 (1972) for computing time, and I do not desire to confuse the issue. However, it is my opinion that the legislature has stated unambiguously the time for advertisement preceding a sheriff’s sale. I hope, probably forlornly, that the differences arising from the majority and dissenting opinions will provoke the practical solution of attorneys giving ample time for advertisement rather than grasping the last second for compliance.

Mississippi Code Annotated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pannell v. GlidewellMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  2. O'Quinn v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Mississippi Ben. Ass'n v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API