Legal Opinion · Dissent

Okeechobee Co. v. Rambo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 24, 1931Published

1DissentDavis, J.

(Concurring in part and dissenting in part) : I concur in Mr. Justice Terrell’s statement of the law but not in the conclusion that there is reversible error in the record.

The plea of privilege which was filed by the defendant corporation in this case, omitting its formal parts, is as 1 follows:

“Comes now Okeechobee Company, by M. B. Carmichael, its solicitor, and enters this its Plea of Privilege to the Bill of Complaint of Meta Eambo, by her next friend and husband, J. G. Eambo, and Eugene Porter, Complainants, and says:

That Dade County is not now and was not at the time of the filing of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DaCosta v. DibbleSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  2. Henderson v. ChairesSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Crystal River Lumber Co. v. Consolidated Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API