Legal Opinion

Pace v. . McAden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Tbe plaintiff claims title under a grant (No. 15831), issued to Eunice Postell on 28 March, 1903, and registered on 5 May next succeeding, and upon tbe trial be introduced mesne conveyances connecting bis title with that of tbe grantee. Tbe defendants claim under a grant (No. 3111), issued to E. B. Olmsted on 10 November, 1867, and registered 4 June, 1884, and upon tbe trial it was admitted that they have an unbroken chain of title and have succeeded to whatever title Olmsted acquired under this grant. It is therefore obvious that tbe point of divergence is tbe location of tbe grants from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yow v. Hamilton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Hemphill v. Hemphill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Bowen v. . GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Rollins v. . WickerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Yadkin Lumber Co. v. BernhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Brown v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Cheek v. Barnwell Warehouse & Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Owens v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API