Legal Opinion

Bertorelli v. City of Tulare

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1986No. F005205PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOOLPERT, J.

We are asked to reverse a trial court order denying a Government Code section 946.6 1 petition for relief from the governmental tort claims statute (§ 945.4) 2 under circumstances which argue for relief, but do not fit any single indisputable rule of law compelling reversal. During the 100-day claim period after a motor vehicle accident involving a municipal truck, an insurance company filed a technically adequate subrogation claim seeking recovery for property damage on its own behalf and that of its insured. The insured’s personal injury claim was not, however, mentioned.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. California Cigarette Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Mills v. Forestex Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Munoz v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Ocean Services Corp. v. Ventura Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Barragan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API