Harmon v. State

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, five years in penitentiary.

There is no complaint on appellant’s part of the insufficience of the evidence, and we deem the jury amply warranted in their conclusion of guilt, and see no good to come from setting out the testimony.

Appellant has five bills of exception. By his Bill No. 1 he complains of the fact that a convicted codefendant of this appellant, one West, was permitted to testify for the State. There is nothing in appellant’s bill or in the record which shows when said witness was convicted, and we are unable to know whether it…