Legal Opinion

Barker v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1925No. 7 Div. 73Published

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of having in his possession a still, apparatus, appliance, or device, or substitute therefor, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages, etc., and he appeals.

The evidence for the state in its strongest aspects was by the witness Draper that—

“We went to his (defendant’s) house and found a still worm in his closet next to his bedroom, and under the house we found a thumper keg and’ connection pipe to that keg. * * * The still worm. I found was suitable for the purpose or to be used for the purpose of making liquor. * *…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ammons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Segars v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Watkins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Fillmore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API