Jennings v. Commissioner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Leventhal, J. (dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. I do not concur with the majority’s conclusion that there was a rational basis for the determination of the New York State Department of Health (hereinafter the DOH) that the transfer of the settlor/ parent’s recurring income into a supplemental needs trust (hereinafter SNT), created for his or her disabled adult child, must be counted toward his or her net available monthly income (hereinafter NAMI) for calculation of his or her own Medicaid post-eligibility benefits. For the reasons stated below, I believe that 42 USC § 1396p (d) does not…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.