Legal Opinion

State v. Holloway

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1975No. SC 891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

The State of Alabama appeals from a judgment awarding damages of $30,000 to landowners in a condemnation proceeding. Judgment was in accordance with a jury verdict. We affirm.

Three assignments of error are argued in brief.

The first assignment of error charges that the trial court erred in sustaining landowners’ objection to the following question propounded by the State to one of its own expert witnesses:

“Q All right, does this chicken plant in your opinion have a detrimental effect on the property in the general neighborhood?
“MR. TORBERT: Now we object to that, if the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. James v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. State v. WoodhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Golden v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FrithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Lance, Inc. v. RamanauskasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Ex Parte Dial Kennels of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Grayson v. DunganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API