Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CAT BROOKS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01418-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 10 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, Docket Nos. 28, 37 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 Pending before the Court is Defendant Thomson Reuters Corporation’s (“Thomson 15 Reuters’s”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz’s complaint pursuant to 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Docket No. 28 (“Mot.”). 17 For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS in part and…