Legal Opinion
Wyatt v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 18, 1972No. 71-425PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Judge.
The defendant was convicted of robbery and appeals. We reverse because of an erroneous interpretation and application of Rule 1.250, F.R.Cr.P., 33 F.S.A., it being exactly worded as Section 918.09, F.S.1969, F.S.A. The provision is:
“918.09 Accused may make himself a witness. — In all criminal prosecutions the accused may at his option be sworn as a witness in his own behalf, and shall in such case be subject to examination as other witnesses, but no accused person shall be compelled to give testimony against himself, nor shall any prosecuting attorney be permitted before the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Amos v. MosleySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Birge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Mitchum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Freeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- ABEL B. GARCIA v. OLGA C. SOTODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Walters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974