Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Sharp

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 3, 1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Coubt by

Judge Fulton

— Reversing.

The appellants, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Fred W. Ball and A. H. Henderson, are appealing from a judgment for $3,000 rendered against them in behalf of the appellee, C. O. Sharp, in an action for malicious prosecution.

Ball and Henderson, employed as police officers by ■the Company, received what they regarded as reliable information that appellee, Sharp, also an employee of the Company, and whom Ball and Henderson did not know, had on his premises certain tools which had been •stolen from the Company. Having communicated this fact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schott v. Indiana National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Davis v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Hogg v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. J. B. Colt Co. v. GrubbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Garcia v. WhitakerKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Reid v. TrueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  3. Harter v. Lewis Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  4. Sweeney v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  5. Carroll v. YoungDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API